Australian Regulators Take a Stand: Holding X Accountable for Avoiding CSAM Response Queries
Australia Fines X for Inadequate Response on Child Exploitation
Australia has imposed a significant fine on X (formerly Twitter) for its failure to provide satisfactory answers to questions regarding child exploitation. This penalty, amounting to AUD 610,500 (around $387,000), was charged to the Elon Musk-owned company for not complying with the national law that mandates social platforms to disclose their strategies for combating online child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
Challenges in Holding Social Platforms Accountable
In an interview with The New York Times, Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, highlighted the challenges in regulating social media companies. She emphasized that companies often make vague statements about child exploitation prevention, but the Australian government is determined to see concrete actions and transparency. This action is not only intended to deter companies from evading their responsibilities but also to serve the public interest.
Failure to Fully Comply
Australian authorities expressed their dissatisfaction with both X and Google for their responses to the inquiries. Google received a formal warning for providing generic or aggregated information rather than specific details. X’s violation was deemed more severe, as they inadequately answered questions and even left some sections blank. Inman Grant stated that X’s initial response lacked vital information, and it was evident that the company had the required data but chose not to provide it.
The Timeline of Non-Compliance
The eSafety Commissioner’s office initiated this process by sending a notice to X (then known as Twitter) on February 22, with a request to answer mandatory questions within 35 days. X responded on March 29, but Inman Grant identified 14 questions, including sub-questions, where the company failed to provide the necessary information. Follow-up questions were sent on April 6, and X responded on May 5, which led Inman Grant to conclude that the company had initially withheld crucial information. She emphasized the company’s capability to provide the required data from the beginning.
Consequences and Future Compliance Measures
Australia has the option to pursue civil penalties through the courts if X does not pay the imposed fine. Furthermore, the country is implementing more powerful systemic tools in the form of industry codes and standards, which will ensure that companies fulfill their obligations in protecting children. These tools are expected to become active next year.
X’s Audience and Responsibility
X had previously informed Australian regulators that children were not its target audience, emphasizing that its services were not primarily used by children. However, CEO Linda Yaccarino contradicted this statement by acknowledging that Gen Z, the younger demographic, was the fastest-growing group on the platform. X reported having 200 million unique monthly visitors among teenagers and young adults in their twenties.
Conclusion
Australia’s action against X reflects the growing importance of holding social platforms accountable for their efforts to prevent child exploitation. The penalty and future compliance tools indicate the government’s commitment to ensuring the safety and well-being of children online.
Also read: Taylor Swift’s ‘The Eras Tour’ Dominates North American Box Office, Raking in $96 Million